Brief Remarks on the Preceding Paper

 •  3 min. read  •  grade level: 8
Allow me to make a remark on ‘Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth,’ the first article in your number for May. In the general principles and spirit of the article I cordially agree, and judge it to be most timely. But the path of wisdom is a narrow one—one which the vulture’s eye has not seen. And there is a point in the paper in which the word does not seem to me to be rightly divided, or rather, that is attributed to the passage (2 Tim. 2:1515Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (2 Timothy 2:15)) which is not in it.
It involves, I am satisfied, very important consequences in spiritual judgment, or I should not perhaps have noticed it. I am not aware that I differ from the writer in general practical result. It is a point which has been a good while on my mind; and while hesitating whether it was God’s will that I should formally notice it, the article of which I speak gives, by its statement, direct occasion to do so. The point I refer to is in the following passage:—“According to all this Timothy is here told of a house that he has to leave, and not (as the first epistle had told him) of a house in the midst of which he was to ‘behave’ himself.” I find no direction whatever in the passage to leave the house—no trace of such a thought, but other directions given which exclude the thought. And this is evident in the change of language which the article introduces into the scriptural phrase. We are, therefore, to purge ourselves from it, and not strive to purge it. ‘Now the passage does not tell us either to purge it or to purge ourselves from it. I admit that the thought of purging it is wholly foreign to the passage. No such thought is presented to the believer to guide his conduct. But he is not told to purge himself from it, but to purge himself from the vessels to dishonor.’ If a man shall purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel made to honor, fit for the master’s use.’ A vessel where? The master of what? The foundation of God standeth sure. The Lord knoweth them that are his.’ No matter what the confusion and evil, there is divine security; and let every one that names the name of Christ depart from iniquity.’ There is the unchangeable character of human responsibility, whatever state the nominal or real church may be in. But there is no direction to depart from the house. It is not said that we are to purge ourselves from it, but from the vessels to dishonor, which are not it. If Christ be the master of the house—whatever vessels are in it—how can we? Whatever consequences may be drawn, the first and essential point is to hold fast the word itself. I am satisfied the point is not an unimportant one, and that the truth gives more true separation and departure from iniquity than any misapprehension of the word of God can, however upright in purpose it may be.
Faithfully yours,
ΟΥΤΙΣ