Jesus Forgiving Sins

Matthew 9:6; Mark 2:9; Luke 5:24  •  16 min. read  •  grade level: 7
Listen from:
God was showing His rich and various mercy in the old time; but this was done after a peculiar manner. He forgave sin, He healed disease, He fed His people. But all this was done in a peculiar manner. There was a certain distance and reserve, as it were, a remaining still in His own sanctuary, still in the heavens, though He was thus gracious. He met the need of a sinner; but He was in the temple withdrawn to the holiest place, and the sinner had to come through a consecrated path to get the virtue of the mercy-seat. He met the need of His camp in the desert; but it was by remaining still in heaven, and sending from thence the angels’ food, the mighty’s meat, and giving them water, after His mystic rod had opened the rock. He met the disease of a poor leper; but it was after such leper had been separated to Him outside the camp, every eye and hand, all interference and inspection of man, withdrawn and removed. Thus He was God acting in His own due love and power; but there was a style in the action that bespoke distance from the objects of His care and goodness. Whether He pardoned, Jed, or healed, this manner was preserved.
The Lord Jesus, “God manifest in the flesh,” is seen doing the same works of divine love and power. He pardons, feeds, and heals. And He does so in full assertion of His divine right or glory, thinking it no robbery to be equal with God. But there is altogether another style in those same actions when in His hand. The reserve, the distance is gone. It is God we see, not withdrawn into the holiest, but abroad in the prisons, the hospitals, and poor-houses of this ruined world. He pardons, but He stands beside the sinner to do this, saying, “Thy sins be forgiven thee;” or, “Neither do I condemn thee.” He feeds, but He is at the very table with the fed. He heals, but He puts forth His hand, in the crowd, on as many as were diseased, or stands at their sick-beds. He thus comes down to the needy ones. With pardon, food, and healing, He goes among them, letting them know and see that He is supplied with various virtues to be used by them without reserve. And there is in this a glory that excelleth, so that the former has no glory by reason of it.
How should we bless Him for this display of Himself! It is the same God of love and power in both—but He has increased in the brightness of His manifestations.
The religious rulers found this way of Jesus interfere with them. Their interest was to keep God and the people separate; for then they had hopes of being used themselves. Thus they were angry when the Lord said to the man, “Thy sins are forgiven thee.” It was a great interference with them. It trespassed on their place. “Who can forgive sins but God only?”—and God was in heaven. The Son of Man forgiving sins on earth was a sad disturbance of that order by which they lived in credit and plenty in the world. But whether they received it or not, this was the way of the Son of God on the earth. He dealt with our necessities in such wise as encouraged the happy, near, and confident approach of all needy ones to Him He did all to show that He was a cheerful giver; nay, more, that He gave Himself with His gifts. For with His own hand, as we have seen, He brought the blessing home to every man’s door.
It was, therefore, only the happy confidence of faith that fully met and refreshed His spirit-that faith which knew the title of a needy one to come right up to him—the faith of a Bartimaeus, which was not to be silenced by the mistaken scrupulousness of even disciples. And little children are to be in His arms, though the same mistake would forbid them.
This was His mind. He came into the world to be used by sick and needy sinners, and the faith that understood and used Him accordingly was its due answer. Such answer we see recorded by the evangelists here, in the action of the faithful little band, who, breaking up the roof, let down the bed whereon the sick of the palsy lay, “into the midst before Jesus.” There was no ceremoniousness in this; nothing of the ancient reserve of the temple; no waiting for introduction. This little company felt their necessity, knew the virtues of the Son of God, and believed that these suited each other; nay, that the Lord carried the one because necessitous sinners were bearing the other. It was a very strong expression of this, and I believe the strength of it was according to the mind of Jesus; so that on seeing their faith, as we read, without further to do, or more words, His heart, and the grace that it carried, uttered itself in an expression as full and strong: “Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.”
Here was sympathy. Jesus was rending all veils between God and sinners, and so was the faith of this happy little company. His blood was soon to rend the vail of the temple, which kept God from poor sinners, from top to bottom, and now their faith was rending that which kept them from Jesus. This surely was meeting and entertaining the Son of God in character; and His Spirit deeply owns it: “Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.”
Happy faith that can thus break down all partition-walls! Oh, this faith, that takes knowledge of Jesus the Savior of the world as the mighty render of all veils! which knows that nothing stands before Him
“Join thou, my soul, for thou canst tell
His sovereign grace broke up thy cell,
And burst thy native chains;
And from that dear and blessed day,
How oft art thou constrained to say
That grace triumphant reigns!”
In the lively, happy impression of this truth, through the Spirit, the soul tastes something of heaven. What blessedness to know that this is the way of God our Savior! Grace and glory are both brought to us. We have not to ascend to heaven to seek them there, nor to descend to the depths to search after them there. “Behold, I come, and My reward is with Me,” will Jesus say, when He brings the glory, as we have already seen Him with His grace standing at the door, or by the bedside, or in the crowd of needy sinners.
This is of God indeed. It is only divine love that can account for it. But the rulers did not like it. Their interest and credit in the world was to keep the forgiveness of sins still in the hand of Him who was in heaven; for then, as the consecrated path, they hoped and judged that they themselves would still be used.
And so it is to this day. Forgiveness is brought near and sure to the soul; the word of faith to the heart and to the mouth. This shortens the path; but it does not suit those who transact (as themselves and others judge) the interests of the soul.
Nothing appears more simple than all this on the principles of nature. The Pharisees in the Lord’s time represented it. They were the religious rulers; and the more God was kept in the distance, the more reserve was preserved between Him and the people, the more they were likely to be venerated, used, and enriched. Jesus, the Son of Man, forgiving sins on the earth, was a sad trespasser on their place and plan of action. How, alas! is this principle still alive, still dominant! And the “people love to have it so;” it suits the religiousness of man’s nature too well to be lightly refused. The simplicity that is in Christ is sadly thus “corrupted,” and our souls, beloved, should be grieved, deeply grieved, because of it.
But we may also say that much occasion in our day has been given to this principle-to live and act as vigorously as it seems to be doing. For there has not been the meeting of the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, this pardoning, feeding, healing love and power of Him who has come down to walk amid our ruins, in the spirit which alone was due to it. There has been the assertion of grace, and the denial that God in this dispensation is to be sought for as at a distance, under the hiding of ceremonies, or within the cloisters of temples. There has been the producing of the blessed Savior, and giving Him to walk abroad among our necessities according to the place He has Himself taken in the gospel. There has been the presenting of the marvelous condescending grace of the dispensation; but those who have asserted it have not carried themselves towards it, and in the presence of it, with that reverence, that holiness of confidence, which alone became them. And this has given man’s religiousness (which would keep God still in heaven) occasion to revive, and be listened to and learned again.
But is this religiousness the due corrective of abused grace? Is this the divine remedy? Is this God’s way of rectifying evil? or is it not simple human reaction? Many are doing what they can to withdraw the Lord to that place which He has most advisedly and forever abandoned. They are making Him appear to build again the things which He had destroyed. They are putting Him back into the holiest place, there to be sought unto by the old aisles and vistas of the “worldly sanctuary”—to cover Him with veils, and cast up the long-consecrated path by which of old the sinner came to Him. It was well to be righteously angry at Jesus and His grace being treated with so indelicate and untender a hand; but these correct the error by a worse. While they would protect the holiness of Christ, they obscure His grace. They are seeking to do a service for Him that grieves Him the most deeply. They are teaching man that He is an austere Master; they withdraw Him to the place where it is felt to be a fearful thing to plant one’s foot.
Indeed, this is a service He did not ask for. “Who has required this at your hands?” is, I am assured in my soul, the voice of the Son of God to those who thus withdraw Him from the nearest and most assured approach of the poor sinner. They have been doing what they could to change His place and attitude, instead of MAN’S. Correction was needed surely. It is ever needed. Man will be spoiling or abusing everything. There has been an intellectual arrogance, and carnal freedom with Christ and His truth, which may well have grieved the righteous. But it was man that ought to be corrected, and not Christ. It was man that ought to have been challenged to change his place and bearing, and not the Lord. He has not repented of having come on earth to forgive sins, of having visited the poor Samaritan at the well, or Levi or Zaccheus in their houses, or Peter’s wife’s mother on her bed of sickness. He is still the same Lord, and purposes to be so. He has not retired within the vail again, nor bound up that which was rent from top to bottom. He has not built again that which He had destroyed. It is not a worldly sanctuary that He fills, and furnishes again, nor ceremonies and observances, and rites and practices, under which He is again concealing Himself. He has descended from heaven to earth; He is abroad among men, in the ministry of His precious gospel and by His Spirit, beseeching sinners to be reconciled.
What then, alas! is the character of that effort that would force him back to the “thick darkness”? (2 Chron. 6:1-21Then said Solomon, The Lord hath said that he would dwell in the thick darkness. 2But I have built an house of habitation for thee, and a place for thy dwelling for ever. (2 Chronicles 6:1‑2)) It is an attempt made in the strength and with the subtlety of the devil, upon the Son of God, as of old. It is a taking Him, as it were, to the pinnacle of the temple, to some withdrawn and proud elevation, where the multitude may gaze at Him. But His purpose is, blessed be His name, to stand in the midst of them, that they may use Him We should change our place; that is equally true. We should learn to pass and repass before this gracious, blessed Son of Man with the unshod foot. It is for us to change our attitude, and not to seek to make Him change His.
We have still to see Him in all the grace of this happy dispensation; we have to read “the gospel of the blessed God” (1 Tim. 1) as they read it of old, who knew and felt that the Son of Man had power on earth to forgive sins; but we have to read all this more in their spirit also. We are to wonder at the strange sight as they did-to tell Jesus with the centurion, that we are not worthy that He should come under our roof, while we still use His immediate presence and grace, to stand before Him like Zacchaeus, and call Him “Lord,” though, like him, receiving Him to our house, and to follow Him in the way with adoring, thankful praise, though having refused, as Bartimaeus, to be put at a distance by the vain, religious scruples of even His own disciples.
Ah! this is what should have been done. This would have been the divine corrective of the mischief that has come in. But this was not so easy. For this would have been spiritual; the thing that has been done is carnal. Elements of the world are revived and multiplied. Jesus has been forced back at a distance from the sinner. He has been put into “the thick darkness,” under cover of fleshly observances and rites, and at the end of a long path through the aisles of a sanctuary, where He waits to receive the homage of a fearing and bondaged people. This is the place and attitude which many teachers (who are daily rising in the esteem of the people) make the blessed Savior to fill and to take.
The Lord Jesus is kept at a distance; religious observances are brought near, and the people (for they have ever been so minded) like the feelings that come from all that which is acted before them. Their eye and ear are engaged, a certain sacred sense of God is awakened, but the precious immediate confidence of the heart and conscience is refused. Ah, shall any who love the Lord thus sink down again into man, when the Spirit would have them up into Christ! “O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth crucified among you? Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?” “Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labor in vain.”
Thus speaks the aggrieved Spirit in the apostle over those who once had been eminently his joy, but were now his sorrow, because they were turning again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto they were desiring again to be in bondage, because they were deserting faith for religiousness, “the simplicity that is in Christ,” and in which the “virgin” or “uncorrupted “mind ever walks, for the ceremonies and observances of “a worldly sanctuary.”
But religiousness is neither faith nor righteousness. With the Pharisees it was adopted as a relief for a bad conscience, or a cover for evil—in them it was therefore opposed to righteousness. With the Galatians, because there had been a departure from the truth—the simplicity that is in Christ—in them, therefore, it was opposed to faith. The Galatian cannot properly be said to have been a Pharisee, it is true; but the Spirit of God had a serious question with both.
And I may just further observe, that in our passage (Matt. 9:66But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. (Matthew 9:6); Mark 2:99Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk? (Mark 2:9); Luke 5:2424But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power upon earth to forgive sins, (he said unto the sick of the palsy,) I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy couch, and go into thine house. (Luke 5:24)) the Lord seeks to lead man away from his own reasonings and calculations to Himself and His works. He perceived that the scribes were “reasoning among themselves,” and then proposed to them what He was doing— “that ye may know that the Son of Man hath power on earth to forgive sins (he said unto the sick of the palsy), I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy couch, and go unto thine house.”
How simple, how precious! And on this hangs the grand distinction between faith and religiousness, of which I have just been speaking. Religiousness, or man’s religion, gives the soul many a serious thought about itself, and many a devout thought about God. But faith, or God’s religion, gives the soul Jesus, and the works and words of Jesus.
And yet it is faith and faith only that secures any end that is valued of God. Faith “works by love,” faith “overcomes the world,” faith “purifies the heart,” by faith “the elders obtained a good report.” Religiousness does not this. It ever works by fear, not by love. It does not “overcome the world,” but ofttimes takes it away within to some recess or hiding-place. It does not “purify the heart” by giving it an object, a divine object, to detach it from self, but keeps self in a religious attire ever before it, and leaves the conscience unpurged. And in God’s record it gets no “good report.” From the beginning to the end of that record it is the people of religion, the devout observers of carnal ceremonies, those who would not “defile themselves” with a judgment-hall, that have stood most cruel in the resistance of the truth. But it is the men of faith, the lovers of the truth, the poor, brokenhearted sinners who have found their relief in Jesus “forgiving sins,” who have stood, and labored, and conquered, and have their happy memorial with Him and in the records of Him whom they trusted, and in whom by faith they found their eternal life, and sure and full salvation.
“Unto Him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in His own blood, and hath made us kings and priests unto God and His Father; to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.”
132