IF we meditate from the 9th verse of chapter xviii. down to the 10th verse of chapter xix., we have the mind of the Lord delivered out on various detached subjects. It is a blessed thing to hear the mind of Christ on any single matter. His verdict entitles me to say I know how God thinks in such a case. This a wonderful privilege. There is a difference between the gospels and the epistles. The gospels introduce your heart to Christ, to find in Him its satisfaction; the epistles introduce the conscience to Christ, to find in Him its peace.
We find here, first, the parable of the Pharisee and the Publican. The Lord describes the condition of soul in both of these. The mind of the Pharisee was a mind of religious pride and self-satisfaction. The mind of the publican was the mind of a poor broken-hearted one, that could not so much as lift up his eyes to heaven. Having these two objects before Him, the Lord lets us know His thoughts about them, and when He gives forth His mind, does it not make you happy to know that He approved the Publican and not the Pharisee? It is a comfort to know that the mind of the Lord thus suits itself to your mind. I could not say that the publican was the expression of a fully justified man. He was justified "rather" than the other. He would riot, if fully justified, have cried out, "God be merciful to me, a sinner." Is that the proper condition of a believer? No. "The life that I now live in the flesh, I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me." That is not a poor publican, howling out about his misery. He does not utter, again I say, the language of a consciously justified sinner. No doubt he was on the way to it for " he that humbleth himself shall be exalted." Still there is comfort for us in this, when we see that the Lord values these first tremblings of the poor publican. Paul may have penetrated the innermost part of the sanctuary, and the poor publican 'be only at the brazen altar, but all these differences are very sweet to us who are conscious of our feebleness. The next case is that of those who brought to Him young children, that He might touch them, "but when His disciples saw it they rebuked them." Here we have to determine between the strangers and the disciples. Now do not we know that ofttimes those who are more familiar with the things of Christ, are less intimate? I think we see it here. These strangers had a better understanding of the Lord's mind than the disciples. They said, " Stand by." ".No," said the Lord. Would you Wee the Lord to have approved the disciples rather than the strangers? I will answer for it you would not. Now, am I not right in saying that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John have done a worthy and wondrous work for us, in introducing our hearts to Christ? When the heart is satisfied, and the conscience is at peace, you are close upon heaven. You are pleased with the judgment of the Lord in this case. Some say, "The Lord is better to us than our fears." A poor thought! He is better to us than our expectations. The strangers had said, " touch them;" but He took them into His arms and pressed them to His bosom (Mark 10:16): How He exceeds all our thoughts!
Next, we have the case of the rich young ruler. He brought an uneasy conscience and said, " What shall I do to inherit, eternal life?" He saw that the Lord was a good man, as we speak; and uneasy, he saw the life of the Lord Jesus and watched it, and had no doubt that He had the secret of peace; so he came and put the question which the Lord beautifully answers by another, " Why callest thou me good?"-because you have no right to call even Jesus " good" if He is not "God over all." This man did not apprehend His glory, so the Lord would not accept the title from him. He knew how to answer every man. He did not say He was not good, but "Why callest thou me good? You have no title to call me good. You know the commandments.",." Well," says the young man, "all these I have kept; what lack I yet?" "Yet lackest thou one thing," said the Lord; "sell all that thou halt, and come, follow me." What is the meaning of that? Why, that if I will put myself in the track of Christ, I must be like Christ. The Lord gave up everything and came down as an emptied man to serve others. "Now if you will be perfect, go and do likewise." And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful, for he could not comply. How would you like the kingdom of God characterized? by selfishness or by unstinted benevolence? "Oh," you will say, "let selfishness perish here." The young man could not give up everything, so the Lord says that is a condition unfit for the kingdom. You may be ashamed of your own wretched, selfish heart every day, but I will answer for it you will justify the Lord's answer. Worldliness and selfishness have no power to breathe the atmosphere of the kingdom of God. Do not all these things please you? You have to carry on a warfare with the same mind in you as was in the Pharisee, the disciples, and the young ruler. Conflict is your perfection here, as sinlessness will be in your glorified body. What a different Christ you would have had if He had approved the. Pharisee rather than the publican, kept the little children at a distance, or allowed the selfishness of the young ruler! I do not doubt that the young man was struggling after the kingdom, or that he got into it by-and-bye. I do not doubt that there was a laboring of soul that was given of God.'
In the 31st verse the Lord turns to speak of His going up to Jerusalem, and of all that He must suffer there;' but "they understood none of these things." No, they were very ignorant. We may observe that the Lord never speaks of His death without speaking also of His resurrection; as the prophets of the Old Testament never spoke of the judgments coming on their nation without the glories that should follow. So it 'should be with you and me. We may talk of death at times, but resurrection and glory should come rapidly in on our thoughts.
The Lord is still on the way, and I invite you again to look at the mind of Christ. Here is a collision between a blind beggar and the multitude, and the Lord comes in to decide between the two. Are you pleased with the decision He makes? I am sure you are. You Would have had a very different Christ if He had joined the multitude in telling the blind man to hold his peace. Every stroke of the Evangelist's pen is full of the beauty and perfection of Jesus. The blind man asked who passed by, hearing the multitude, and they answer, "Jesus of Nazareth." "Is that all you know of Him? Jesus, Son, of David, have mercy on me." What acquaintance, tell me, had this man with Christ? He knew Him (and so must you and I) in His personal. glory, and in the boundlessness of His grace. He called Him "Son of David," and when they told Him to hold his peace, he cried "so much the more." That is how you and I must know Him. If He be not the person He is, all He has done is worth nothing. If He be not man, as one with the children (Heb. 2), and God as alone sufficient to put away sin by Himself, it is all in vain. If we do not recognize the glory of His person, the grace of. His work is worth nothing. We must connect His grace And His glory. The confession of the blind beggar showed an apprehension of' these two things. He did not take up their word, but called Him Son of David; and when they rebuked him, he. "cried all the more." Now how did the Lord decide? " What is it that you want!" His dignity is beautiful as. He stops on His way at the bidding of a poor blind beggar. Joshua once bid the sun stand still in the heavens, but here the Lord of the sun and the moon and the heavens stands still at the biddinu.b of a blind beggar I That is the gospel -the Glorious Gracious One dispensing the grace of eternal healings to meet your degradation. W'e often admire Jacob, laying hold on the divine Stranger, but look at Bartimaeus! He would not hold his tongue, but cried out till Jesus stood and said, " What wilt thou that I shall d.) unto thee?" " Lord, that I may receive my sight." "Take it," said Jesus.
Now look at Zacchaeus. He saw the Lord pass, and went through the crowd to get up into the sycamore tree. In the narratives of the four gospels there are two cases that distinguish themselves from each other, one is an exercised faith, as in Bartimaeus, the other is a quickening of spirit. This was Zaccheus. In John, the second class of these prevails most, as in Andrew, Nathanael, Philip, the Samaritan woman. These are all cases of quickening. In the two cases before us, we get samples of what I mean. Bartimeus was exercising faith, Zaccheus was getting life. It is a very simple story. He had a desire to see Christ. Who gave the desire? The life-giving Spirit of Christ. How beautiful to see eternal life beginning in such a seed! The power that clothed the desire is strongly manifest. Pressing through crowds, and climbing up trees, was not the habit of this rich citizen. He made himself one of the rabble to gratify this commanding desire, and got up. into a tree. The Lord called him down. He not only knew that there was a man in the tree, but He knew who he was; "Zacchaeus, come down." Is there intimacy in all this? Are you pleased with it? I will answer for it you are. So we have the Lord delivering judgment in detached cases, and such a judgment as contributes to make us happy.
You can easily conceive with what haste Zaccheus came down. They spent the rest of the day together, and what is the fruit of their communion? "Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken anything from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold." His heart instinctively uttered itself-a very different thing from the boastfulness of a self-righteous mind. The simple force of communion with his Lord enabled Zaccheus thus to speak. There was power when he pressed through the crowd, and there was power when he closed that day, which had given him communion with Jesus.