Scripture Queries and Answers: The Calling and Inheritance in Ephesians and 1 Peter

 •  2 min. read  •  grade level: 9
 
Q.-What is the difference between the calling and the inheritance as in the Epistle to the Ephesians, from the same terms in the First Epistle of Peter? J. C.
A.-The Apostle Paul was given to reveal the calling and the inheritance in all the height and depth, length and breadth of the glory of Christ, the Son and glorified man in the heavenlies, the Head over all things and Heir of all things, our portion one with Himself and joint-heirs with Him.
The Apostle Peter was inspired to present rather the Christian's heavenly calling and place, and God's family, His priests and kings, in contrast with Israel's hopes; and therefore to an incorruptible and undefiled and unfading inheritance reserved in the heavens for those that are here, guarded by God's power through faith for the salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. It is not a great mystery as in Eph. 5:3232This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. (Ephesians 5:32), respecting Christ and respecting the church; any more than the mystery of God's will and purpose (Eph. 1:9, 109Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself: 10That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: (Ephesians 1:9‑10)) in setting Christ at the head of the universe heavenly and earthly, the inheritance in its fullest extent.
Q.-1. What do you consider the force of the two expressions, " in Christ," and " in the Lord"? 2. What means, as said of marriage, " only in the Lord " (1 Cor. 7:3939The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord. (1 Corinthians 7:39))? G. B. E.
A.-1. Though they approach nearly, there is a shade of difference, the first rather expressing privilege, the latter responsibility. 2. This is certainly so in the case proposed. Two persons might be " in Christ," truly attached in affection, but the one entering into the full relationship of the Christian, the other hardly rising in faith or practice above a simple believer, content with remission of sins and general care as to moral walk, and in a false position ecclesiastically. Would it be " in the Lord " for such to marry? Can two walk together before Him who are not agreed in a duty so important for His glory?