“In the eyes of the law, one witness (not an accomplice) is sufficient to prove the highest offense known to the law-murder. Two witnesses are required to prove treason, and three witnesses is the highest number required to prove the execution of a will.
“There could have been no case of mistaken identity. The five hundred witnesses were liable to err through bias, but where was the motive? Their cause was condemned, their leader killed, themselves outcasts. Would they swear falsely to His identification? It is incredible. The witnesses to the resurrection of Christ never contradicted or denied their testimony, but told the same story as long as they lived.
“This is always competent evidence, especially where the number of witnesses is large. These witnesses all led exemplary lives. As long as life lasted, they lived in poverty and virtue, as their Master had taught. Most of them suffered martyrdom after preaching the gospel all their lives at great personal hazard. Had they not been sincere, they would not have persisted as they did to the end. Yes, any court in the land would have to accept that evidence!”