“One of the greatest difficulties in believing that the Lord will return before the millennium, is that it involves a totally different interpretation of passages of scripture, upon which have been based what may be called household truths of Christianity, such for instance as the general resurrection and the general judgment, apparently held by all Christians since the times of the apostles. Many passages speak of “the resurrection” without the least intimation description God has given of mankind one, or that any particular resurrection is meant; and Acts 24:1515And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust. (Acts 24:15) refers to ‘a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust’ implying that both will be raised at one and the same time As to the general judgment, many passages speak of ‘the judgment,’ it is ‘appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.’ (Heb. 9:2727And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: (Hebrews 9:27).) A special day is also appointed for this. (Acts 17:3131Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead. (Acts 17:31).) The quick and the dead are also spoken of together as being judged. (2 Tim. 4:11I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; (2 Timothy 4:1); 1 Pet. 4:55Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead. (1 Peter 4:5).) Is not all this upset and the passages strained to mean something else, if our Lord will return before the millennium, and only a portion of the dead arise at His coming V Unhappily it is too true that the terms “general resurrection” and “general judgment” are become household doctrines with many Christians. It is strange that it should be so, seeing that neither of the terms occurs in scripture. It also shows how readily certain statements are received and held as truths without the least trouble being taken to see whether they are really taught in scripture or not.
We can easily understand that in some places, as in Acts 24:1515And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust. (Acts 24:15), the fact that all mankind will be raised again, may be alluded to, without there being any occasion to speak of whether all will be raised at one time or not; whereas of other passages the whole force would be lost if the distinction between the just and the unjust was not kept in view.
In the first place it should be noticed that in some passages the true translation is not “resurrection of the dead “but a out of” the dead; that is, some are raised from among the dead, leaving the rest of the dead still in their graves. Now if God has made this distinction in His word—and He has—it has surely been done to teach us the difference. Unhappily this distinction is not sufficiently noticed in the Authorized Version, but it has been shown in other translations. The Authorized Version does translate in several places “from the dead,” but it has not been sufficiently noticed that this means something quite different from a resurrection of the dead.
If we think of the resurrection of our Lord, it must be manifest to all that His resurrection was a rising from among the dead, as we read in 1 Cor. 15:12, 2012Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? (1 Corinthians 15:12)
20But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. (1 Corinthians 15:20); and if the same expression is used for any of God’s people, it must surely mean the same. Take, for instance, our Lord’s declaration that those who will be raised from among the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage: they are the sons of God. (Luke 20:35, 3635But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: 36Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection. (Luke 20:35‑36).)
In Acts 4:1, 21And as they spake unto the people, the priests, and the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees, came upon them, 2Being grieved that they taught the people, and preached through Jesus the resurrection from the dead. (Acts 4:1‑2), we read that the priests, the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees were grieved at Peter and John because they taught the people and preached through Jesus the resurrection from among the dead.
And what can be plainer than what we read in Rev. 20? “Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection.” “The rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished.” What can be the meaning of there being a first resurrection if there is to be but one? And what can a the rest of the dead mean unless some will have been raised previously?
This seemed so plain and positive that we were a little curious to see how it could be otherwise explained. A commentary thus speaks of it: “It is called the first resurrection in contradistinction from the second and last—the general resurrection—when all the dead will be literally raised up from their graves, and assembled for the judgment. (Ver. 12.) It is not necessary to suppose that what is called here the c first resurrection é will resemble the real and literal resurrection in every respect. All that is meant is, that there will be such a resemblance as to make it proper to call it a resurrection—a coming to life again. This will be, as explained in the notes to verse 4, in the honor done to the martyrs; in the restoration of their principles as the great actuating principles of the church; and perhaps in the increased happiness conferred on them in heaven, and in their being employed in promoting the cause of truth in the world.”
This may explain how the term “the general judgment” has become a household dogma among Christians; but is it not arrived at by the shameful frittering away of the plain meaning of scripture? With such treatment, alas! the inspired word may be made to mean almost anything. Surely this is the straining of scripture, rather than taking it to mean simply what it says.
As to there being a general judgment, only a few passages need be referred to. By comparing Matt. 25:31-4631When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: 32And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. 34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: 36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. 37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? 38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? 39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? 40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. 41Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: 42For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: 43I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. 44Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? 45Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. 46And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal. (Matthew 25:31‑46) with Rev. 20:11-1511And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. 12And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Revelation 20:11‑15), in both of which we have before us a sessional judgment, it will be seen that they cannot refer to the same. One speaks of the living only—the nations—the other, the dead only; one speaks of some being blessed, and some being cursed; the other, all are lost; one speaks only of a particular sin—the treatment of the Lord’s brethren; the other, of men’s general sins, as detailed in God’s book of remembrance. How can the two possibly refer to the same occasion? and how can either refer to a general judgment of all mankind?
The Christian will not stand to be judged with the unconverted. Our Lord declared that they should not come into judgment. (John 5:2424Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. (John 5:24).) They will be manifested before the judgment seat of Christ, but not to be judged for their sins; for the Lord Himself will sit on the throne, and He bore the punishment for their sins, and put them away forever.
In all that we have been looking at there is nothing that in any way interferes with the coming of the Lord being the true and blessed hope of the Christian. Indeed, there is one passage that so links the resurrection of the righteous dead with the rapture of the living, that if taken in its plain signification would remove many a difficulty and would furnish the Christian with the brightest of prospects: “The Lord Himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore com-fort one another with these words.” (1 Thess. 4:16-1816For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: 17Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. 18Wherefore comfort one another with these words. (1 Thessalonians 4:16‑18).) May this be the living hope of all God’s beloved people!