Hatred and Love

 •  8 min. read  •  grade level: 8
 
That which I am can be judged of by man, by that which I say, and that which I do. It is judged of by God, according to that which I love, and that which I hate. My words and my actions are more or less a manifestation of the love and hatred which exist in my heart. In the word of God, the love and hatred of the natural man, and the love and hatred of the new man are set before us, so that we may therefore behold ourselves, as seen not by man, but by God. Let us, beginning with the Old Testament, look at the hatred and love of the natural man.
He hates (21 Things)
Instruction, Psalms 1:17, &c.
He loves (27 things)
In the New Testament—
He hates (7 things.)
He loves not (5 things.)
He loves (16 things.)
Let us bear in mind in reading these lists that in each case it is not that a selection is made of the objects of love and hatred of the natural heart. All are here given. And thus we find in this portrait of the heart drawn by the hand of God, no good thing is the object of love, nothing but that which is good is the object of hatred in the unconverted man. With the aid of a Concordance this can easily be verified. May it serve to awaken some whose way has as yet been “right in their own eyes.” May it serve to teach us more of the power and value of the work of Christ, by means of which the deepest roots of love and hatred are reached and destroyed, and replaced by a new love, a new hatred, precisely and diametrically the reverse of the love and hatred of the old man. Let each consider whether this marvelous change has really taken place in his or her case. The reversal of these mighty mainsprings of all action and thought is not such a small fact that it can happen without our knowledge of it. “I love the things that once I hated, and I hate the things that once I loved,” was the answer of a poor girl when asked if she knew she had been born again. It is true that it is by looking away from self to Christ, and to Christ only, that we receive forgiveness and life. But where forgiveness and life are, this mighty change is the necessary consequence. “Turned from darkness to light, from the power of Satan unto God.” We will next time look through the deeply interesting passages on the bright side of the subject-the love and hatred of the new man.
The Holy Bible: No. 7. —Remarks Upon The Books Of The Old Testament.
THE SONG. Solomon was not only a Preacher (Ecclesiastes). and a Moralist (Proverbs), but a Song-composer (Canticles). Of the coos Songs (1 Kings 4:3232And he spake three thousand proverbs: and his songs were a thousand and five. (1 Kings 4:32)) written by Solomon, all have perished save this one which is styled by way of preeminence “The Song of Songs,” unless we include in the number of 1005 the two psalms 72 and 127 attributed to Solomon.
The book was written in Palestine, probably Jerusalem, by Solomon in the early period of his reign, about 1014 B.C.
All Jews and Jewish writers in ancient times regarded the book as a sacred one, and it has always formed part of the Hebrew canon unquestioned till modern times. It also received the seal of the risen Lord as contributing its quota of testimony to Himself—His sufferings and glories.
THE PROPHETS.
Prophecy and God’s government of the earth, having Palestine as the land, Jerusalem then Babylon, and again Jerusalem as the City, Judah or Israel as the people, and the glory of Christ as the object, form the ground-work and basis of the prophetic revelations contained in the next 17 books-from Isaiah to Malachi.
ISAIAH. This is the grandest, sublimest and most comprehensive of the prophetical books; and because of its copiousness of subjects and wide sweep of the prophetic future occupying the whole scene of God’s purposes respecting Israel and the nations, it is first in order in all Hebrew and English Bibles. If Isaiah lived to the close of Hezekiah’s reign, then he must have worn the prophetic mantle for a period of at least 60 years, dating his introduction to the prophetic office from the last year of Uzziah’s reign (Chapter 6). Being a Judah-prophet, and standing in high repute in the royal court, these magnificent prophecies were mainly uttered in Jerusalem. Jewish tradition asserts that the aged prophet, then about go years old, was “sawn asunder” during the reign of Manasseh, and that to protract his sufferings a wooden saw was used for the cruel purpose. Isaiah too being their favorite prophet must have a royal parentage: so they tell us that Amoz the father of the prophet was a brother of king Amaziah. These traditions are not supported by a particle of evidence. We do not say they are false, neither can we say they are true. This great prophecy is divided into two main portions, the first occupying chaps. 1-39, the second part consist of chaps. 40 to the end. Now in this latter portion the prophetic intimations respecting Babylon and other nations are remarkably full, and have been fulfilled to the letter. Even Cyrus, the Deliverer of the Jews from their Chaldean exile and Destroyer of Babylon, was prophetically appointed for the work, and surnamed about 150 years before he was born. (chaps. 44 and 45.) Here then our modern critics are on the horns of a dilemma. If this latter part of the prophecy be really the work of the “Evangelical Prophet,” or of the “Fifth Evangelist” as some have termed Isaiah, then the authority of Holy Scripture is supreme, for God alone can reveal the future, but then this portion of Isaiah is an integral part of the book. How then can it be got rid of? Well, it is said that the last 27 chapters were written after the events by Ezra, who is thus made the author of a stupidly arranged imposition. Can our denunciations of such unfounded suppositions be too scathing or severe? When our Lord went into the synagogue at Nazareth, there was handed to him “the book of the prophet Esaias,” (Luke 4:17-2117And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, 18The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, 19To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. 20And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears. (Luke 4:17‑21)). Ah! did the Lord not know what our modern infidel scholars have found out, that only the first 39 chapters in general constituted the book of Isaiah. He read a portion of Chapter 61, that is, one of the so-called spurious chapters, and when finished, He said “this day is this Scripture fulfilled in your ears.” Was Christ reading, applying to the consciences of His hearers, and fulfilling what falsely professed to be written by Isaiah? But the theory is baseless, and absolutely false, for Paul cites from the “great unnamed” (Chapter 65) The one to whom this title is applied by German and English divines, was Isaiah to him (Romans 10:2020But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me. (Romans 10:20)) and Isaiah and Scripture to the Lord (Luke 4) Why these persistent efforts to set aside the historical Moses and the prophetic Isaiah? Just this, dear reader, that you may doubt everything and believe nothing. The full verbal inspiration of the Scriptures is the ground of all authority. Hold fast, then, the written word of God.